.
| Hearsay: |
The Globe came out strongly in favour of an end to what it calls a “hidden subsidy” to Canadian publishers, arguing that the strength of the art will prevail over any damage to the sector. Not really sure where I stand on this. But one thing’s for sure: we all know the Globe doesn’t benefit from any hidden subsidies.
The Canadian Booksellers Association met with James Moore, the Minister of Heritage, on April 29, asking the federal government to reconsider the provisions of the Copyright Act that it says, rightly, are no longer commercially reasonable and should be removed.
The present regime favours both branch plants of foreign-owned publishers and Canadian-owned publishers that are also distributors for foreign firms under agency agreements. The Canadian-based publisher can charge up to 10 per cent more than the American price; if they charge more, then what the Copyright Act calls “parallel importation” is permitted – the same is true if a specific book is simply not being distributed.
In effect, this is a subsidy in favour of Canadian publishers, including the subsidiaries of American and other non-Canadian publishers – at the expense of book-buyers. No doubt, this has encouraged the publication of Canadian books, but in recent decades the success of Canadian literature has shown that the rationale for this trade barrier has withered away. Moreover, book-buyers can buy online from the United States and other countries.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
May 12th, 2010 at 8:02 am
Yea, I think the internet makes this well-meaning provision now seem ridiculous.
May 12th, 2010 at 10:48 am
There is so, so much wrong with the Globe’s position (which echoes the CBA’s position) that one hardly knows where to begin.