Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

April 26, 2006

In Plagiarism Today! [Updated]

That headline needs some frantic newsflash theme music with typewriter strikes in the background. Lizzie Skurnick, proprietor of the Old Hag blog, used to work as a ghost writer for the same company that put out young Ms. Kaavya Viswanathan’s YA book. She offers some interesting insights into how YA series titles are produced there in a factory farming-like atmosphere. Further, the way books are edited leaves some doubt as to whether Viswanathan wrote the book herself. This would explain her surprise at some of the nicked passages.

But what exactly does 17th Street do? In light of the plagiarism scandal, this question has taken on new importance. Alloy Entertainment’s president, Leslie Morgenstein, told the Crimson that, “as has been previously reported, we helped Kaavya conceptualize and plot the book.” But it’s not clear where it was ever “reported” that the company “helped Kaavya…plot the book.” The first and most substantive public references to 17th Street’s role in the creation of Opal Mehta came in a February 22 article in the Boston Globe. There, writer David Mehegan said that the company “proposed that Viswanathan put her mind to something lighter, something closer to her own background” than her original writing samples. Based on a “fun, chatty e-mail” that Viswanathan wrote about herself, the “voice and idea for Opal” emerged, Viswanathan told the Globe. But her language makes it impossible to know who actually came up with the “voice and idea” — her or 17th Street.

For her part, Skurnick thinks that the realities of the market, but not any malicious plagiarism on Viswanathan’s part, may account for the similarities with Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings. “They seem like very brief and stupid phrases to copy,” Skurnick said after reading the passages in question. “I’m sure the same phrases are in like 20 teen novels…I think in the case of teen fiction, obviously there are stock characters, there’s a stock plot often, there’s sort of these stock areas — the boy, the body, the family, the friend.”

In further developments, Random House has rejected Viswanathan’s apology. You’d think they’d lie a little lower after the whole Dan Brown thing. But you’d be wrong. (First link from Maud)

UPDATE: People on the street react!

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

1 comment on “In Plagiarism Today! [Updated]”

  1. Paul Clayton says:

    No way should they accept her apology and offer to re-write the stolen excerpts. She should be flogged, or at the very least, forced to do a perp walk. I think anyone who steals a writers work should be shot, but you probably couldn’t get away with that today because of all the bleeding heart propaganda we’ve been subjected to for the last 30 years.

Discuss

Latest comments:
best anti aging cream on
Comics
buy iphone 5 on
Comics
keylogger on
The Man Game: Lee Henderson Interview
raspberry ketone diet on
Comics
raspberry ketone plus on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
binary options trading on
Comics
binary options on
Comics
blackhat forum on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
poker real money on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
wongaloan on
Comics
poker sites uk on
Comics
Laurence on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
888 poker on
Comics
http://www.playonlinepokerwebsites.co.uk on
Comics
poker site on
Comics


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: