Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

February 4, 2010

Amazon is either in the principal’s office or hiding in the science lab

Moby has done a great job covering and contextualize the Macmillan/Amazon dust up. But despite the screaming adoration of their peers and the poverty-stricken love of their authors, Macmillan has seen no sign of their “capitulation”, and their titles remain censored, closed for sale, on the Amazon site.  In fact, there’s no real sign of Amazon at all. I suspect it has to do with in-house vs. contract PR opinions on how to salvage a shred of dignity from this giant FUBAR. Right now Amazon looks like a Little Rascal who got the old backfiring tailpipe in the eye. (And speaking of harming little children for profit, Rupert Murdoch waits in the wings, gleefully rubbing his crooked, skinless fingers together, wondering how he can get in on a piece of ass-kicking that doesn’t result in negative press for once.) You know who’s fault this is? Steve Jobs’. The solution? Buy a tech company that can give Kindle touch capability and cross your fingers. Or in Bezos’s case: talons.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

5 comments on “Amazon is either in the principal’s office or hiding in the science lab”

  1. John McFetridge says:

    That’s right, Macmillan books are still not for sale on Amazon in the US (Amazon Canada wasn’t involvd in this at all).

    So let’s remember, there are lots of other places to buy Macmillan books in the USA.

    (I wonder how close I can get to self-promotion here before George smacks me…)

  2. George says:

    Surprisingly close, I’d say.

  3. Bud says:

    Amazon shouldn’t try to save the Kindle Device, they should just try to keep Kindle eBooks available. Being a bully about it is the wrong tact. Let people read Kindle books they have purchased on their iPads. Those buying an iPad may already have a Kindle, and prefer it for reading because they are not distracted BY THE WEB.

    Trying to marry the Kindle bookstore to Kindle Hardware ONLY is going to backfire in multiple ways. Amazon has a reputation as the consumers friend, being a price controlling, distribution denying Bully is only going to make folks think of them as if they are WalMart.

  4. tolmsted says:

    OK, I’m sorta’ recycling my post from another site – but I’m at work and should be..well…working…

    I feel the need to point out that the Amazon $9.99 model is based on the iPod 99-cent model originated by Apple. The reasons Apple is objecting/not going along with it is because a. it will hurt e-book readers in general to lose that (The Nooks is using that same $9.99 price point) and b. the iPad sales are not dependent on it being sold as an e-book reader, so what do they care? (it’s just a really big iphone – no digital ink folks).

    So, personally, I don’t think Amazon is being any more ridiculous than Apple was with it’s 99-cent iPod pricing – (and everyone was ok with that because iPod’s were soo pretty?). I love my e-reader – but I won’t be paying $15.99 for e-books/digital content that is only really usable on one platform, that I can’t re-sell or lend to friends. And I’m frankly sceptical about how much the $9.99 price point on e-books is actually hurting the publisher when I can buy James Patterson’s new release in hardcover from B&N for $16.79 and a paperback copy of The Book Thief (a NYT Bestseller)for $8.63 – AND have it all shipped to me for free.

    With the release of the iPad Macmillan saw an opportunity to push, and now Amazon is pushing back. Apple, book publishers and Amazon are all just doing what big businesses do – trying to protect their profit margins. And who is going to lose? – the authors and readers. This is FAR from a case of David of standing up to Goliath.

  5. tolmsted says:

    Bub -

    By the way, I believe that Kindle books can be read on the iPad… at least there is an app that allows you to sync your kindle to your iPhone, so I’m assuming it will cross over.

    And I do agree with you that its wrong (and disturbing) that ebooks bought on Amazon can only be used on the kindle, and ebooks bought on B&N can only be used through the Nook and music downloaded from iTunes can only be used on my iPod. But that seems to be the established model, and short of legislation being passed making it illegal (which isn’t such a bad idea – I mean, if Congress can get involved with steroid use in baseball, what the hell? They aren’t getting anything else done) I don’t see how that can be stopped at this point.

Discuss

Latest comments:
George on
News catchup
Monica on
News catchup
Andrew S on
News catchup
Shelley on
On the dangers of writing about the past
Steven W. Beattie on
Get out there, nerds!
Sean Dixon on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Sean Dixon on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Franklin Carter on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven Jensen on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Brian Busby on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Blake on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Bart King on
How to be a good loser
A.G. Pasquella on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Fred on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Zachariah Wells on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven W. Beattie on
Under-rated Canadian writers


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: