.
| Hearsay: |
Lesson number one for authors: never respond to a review. Lesson number one for reviewers: when you review a crazy author you’re going to be reported to the FBI.
After Amazon reviewer LB Taylor gave the novel one star, calling it “a sad excuse for romance, mystery, and humor”, she found herself attacked online by one NiteflyrOne – shortly outed by commentors as Candace Sams, author of the novel. With the discussion numbering almost 400 posts, Sams has now deleted her posts. Fortunately, they’ve been saved for posterity by a host of sites.
“Authors,” she wrote, “rarely have full editorial control; rarely do they have even ’scant’ control over their covers or the language used in dialogue or even sequencing of scenes: love scenes, kissing scenes, scenes of violence, etc. These are ultimately controlled by editorial staff…very rarely the author alone.” Oh I see – blame the editor.
And later, in response to another (also negative) review: “It might behoove them to understand that all romances will not read they way they think they should; romances should ‘not’ be cookie-cutters of one another. This has been the biggest complaint about romance on the whole – that they all sound alike. Apparently ’some’ reviewers ‘want’ them to sound alike. When they don’t, they aren’t able to handle the material.”
She then tells the thread that she’s reporting naysayers to the FBI.
Dudes, if I got reported to the FBI for a bad review, they’d say, “Hey, it’s George. What’s he up to now? Oh. Put this one in the little file.” Cause that’s how I roll, bitches.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
January 4th, 2010 at 10:06 am
I was a little late to the party, but it was almost amusing to watch it implode. A good rule of thumb: never respond to a bad review. Never, ever respond to a bad review by going batcrap insane.
January 4th, 2010 at 7:38 pm
perturbing…….
As I read that my tinnitus started pulsing to the beat of The Twilight Zone.
January 4th, 2010 at 10:53 pm
What…? Why…? Why would…? How come…?
So giving your book a bad review is a federal offense in the magical kingdom in your head. That’s good to know. My only other question is how does the FBI file complaints like this? Does it all go into one list or does it go into one of many sub-sections like “Crackpot” or “Wingut” or “Napoleonic Complex?” If it’s that last one, do they send you a hat? Because that’s just what the Federal Bureau of Investigation is for; sending you gifts and smiting your enemies.
January 4th, 2010 at 11:22 pm
So what? Did the author just expect to get 100% positive reviews? I’m with Fred. If you get a bad review, don’t respond. I just digs the hole deeper. Much much deeper.