Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

January 4, 2010

When authors attack!

Lesson number one for authors: never respond to a review. Lesson number one for reviewers: when you review a crazy author you’re going to be reported to the FBI.

After Amazon reviewer LB Taylor gave the novel one star, calling it “a sad excuse for romance, mystery, and humor”, she found herself attacked online by one NiteflyrOne – shortly outed by commentors as Candace Sams, author of the novel. With the discussion numbering almost 400 posts, Sams has now deleted her posts. Fortunately, they’ve been saved for posterity by a host of sites.

“Authors,” she wrote, “rarely have full editorial control; rarely do they have even ’scant’ control over their covers or the language used in dialogue or even sequencing of scenes: love scenes, kissing scenes, scenes of violence, etc. These are ultimately controlled by editorial staff…very rarely the author alone.” Oh I see – blame the editor.

And later, in response to another (also negative) review: “It might behoove them to understand that all romances will not read they way they think they should; romances should ‘not’ be cookie-cutters of one another. This has been the biggest complaint about romance on the whole – that they all sound alike. Apparently ’some’ reviewers ‘want’ them to sound alike. When they don’t, they aren’t able to handle the material.”

She then tells the thread that she’s reporting naysayers to the FBI.

Dudes, if I got reported to the FBI for a bad review, they’d say, “Hey, it’s George. What’s he up to now? Oh. Put this one in the little file.” Cause that’s how I roll, bitches.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

4 comments on “When authors attack!”

  1. Fred says:

    I was a little late to the party, but it was almost amusing to watch it implode. A good rule of thumb: never respond to a bad review. Never, ever respond to a bad review by going batcrap insane.

  2. Basil Sands says:

    perturbing…….

    As I read that my tinnitus started pulsing to the beat of The Twilight Zone.

  3. Chris Mehrlein says:

    What…? Why…? Why would…? How come…?

    So giving your book a bad review is a federal offense in the magical kingdom in your head. That’s good to know. My only other question is how does the FBI file complaints like this? Does it all go into one list or does it go into one of many sub-sections like “Crackpot” or “Wingut” or “Napoleonic Complex?” If it’s that last one, do they send you a hat? Because that’s just what the Federal Bureau of Investigation is for; sending you gifts and smiting your enemies.

  4. Dave says:

    So what? Did the author just expect to get 100% positive reviews? I’m with Fred. If you get a bad review, don’t respond. I just digs the hole deeper. Much much deeper.

Discuss

Latest comments:
George on
News catchup
Monica on
News catchup
Andrew S on
News catchup
Shelley on
On the dangers of writing about the past
Steven W. Beattie on
Get out there, nerds!
Sean Dixon on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Sean Dixon on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Franklin Carter on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven Jensen on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Brian Busby on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Blake on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Bart King on
How to be a good loser
A.G. Pasquella on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Fred on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Zachariah Wells on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven W. Beattie on
Under-rated Canadian writers


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: