.
| Hearsay: |
Phew. Turns out fucking up my posts here daily means I’m a marginalized freedom-fighter. I just knew I was cooler than I suspected. So where’s the tshirt with my face on it? Salon says the grammar police should like totally back the hell off, man.
To protests that the language police are only protecting the accuracy, precision and clarity of our tongue, Lynch lifts a skeptical eyebrow. Many of the most roundly deplored “debasements” of English are nevertheless perfectly comprehensible: I didn’t confuse you by writing “Ain’t it the truth?” in my opening paragraph, did I? The only truly unbreakable rules of grammar and usage are the ones that, when broken, result in a genuine failure to communicate. The rest is a form of covert class warfare, and today’s usage reproofs constitute a status-protecting thump on the head delivered by the upper middle class to uppity members of the lower middle.
Thinking of the grammar wars in this light helps explain why they provoke such rage. Much as some people might detest seeing the noun “impact” used as a verb, if a lot of people say it and almost everybody understands it when it’s said, then a coup has been effected. The “verbing” of nouns (or the creation of “nerbs”) has been a flashpoint for the past four or five decades with the growth of business management lingo. Complaints about this point to a particularly American social fissure: between the cultured sensibility of the liberally educated and the can-do utilitarianism of striving MBAs.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
October 27th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
There’s nothing ungrammatical about “ain’t” as short for “am I not.” It’s more grammatical than the alternative “aren’t” since “I are not” makes not since. 19th c novels are full of “ain’t” said by professionals and others. It’s just a class thing of the 20th c, as is, bizarrely, “between you and I,” which is completely ungrammatical and a personal pet peeve, since to my ears it also sounds pretentious, but has become standard.
October 27th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
But business management lingo really must be stopped, must’nt it?