.
| Hearsay: |
This isn’t about New Coke vs. Coke Classic, but it kind of is. What of old whatshisface and whoshewhatsit?
Eighty years ago the Manchester Guardian (as this paper then was) ran a poll to discover from its readers’ votes the “novelists who may be read in 2029″. Only another 20 years to go, and the top five are already looking shaky: John Galsworthy (1,180 votes), HG Wells (933), Arnold Bennett (654), Rudyard Kipling (455) and JM Barrie (286).
What of James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, DH Lawrence, Henry Green, Ivy Compton-Burnett, Agatha Christie, EM Forster, and Jean Rhys? This distinguished crew either do not figure in the 1929 poll, or clock in with derisory counts (Joyce gets fewer than 10 votes – alongside Max Beerbohm, it’s pleasing to note).
Why would our choices be so different from those of our grandparents? Because we see literature as “literature”, through the prism of literary criticism and A-level prescriptions. It’s “modernism” that was the big bang in the 1920s. Everyone knows that. In 2009.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
October 26th, 2009 at 11:59 am
isn’t hindsight smart!
October 26th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
I think HG Wells, at least, is still a good bet, and probably Kipling.
October 27th, 2009 at 3:04 am
Agree on Kipling. The only author on the list I have read since college when they make you read the rest.
October 28th, 2009 at 6:26 am
Good spot BookNinja. Personally I prefer Coke Classic.
I’ve blogged about the guardian thing over here: [link in name above]