.
| Hearsay: |
In American Fiction Notes, Mark Athitakis has a bit to say about the nom de plume (which is what Nom de Guerre’s been calling himself so we won’t find out he’s secretly a sissy writer) and its various uses. Aside from the usual reasons of privacy and nonculpability, some of your more prolific authors will put them on, like hats out of a trunk, to dress up for different genres. Of course if you’re as prolific as, say, Joyce Carol Oates, you run the risk of having two stories under two different names being accepted by the same journal. But most of us don’t have to worry about that particular scenario. Mostly the pseudonym is a small flirtation with multiple personalities — or, as Nora Roberts says, “It’s marketing. There’s Pepsi, there’s Diet Pepsi, and there’s Caffeine Free Pepsi.”
It’s also a useful distancing tool for writers who do hack work to pay the bills, so as to avoid the old crap showing up on their Amazon page when they finally sell that literary fiction. Which is not to be confused with distancing tools used by literary fiction authors writing under their own names who would just rather stay home, thanks.
Still, for a really good smokescreen you can’t beat plain old anonymity. Taking that idea and running with it is The New Anonymous, a new journal that blind screens and edits all submissions and then publishes them — you guessed it — anonymously: “At The New Anonymous we celebrate the text. We are at once a literary journal and a literary act.” The first issue is out, and you can order it through their website. It’s also on sale at newstands, but we’re not allowed to tell you which ones.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
July 16th, 2009 at 8:43 am
I mean, who worries about being so bothered by followers that they want to be anonymous? Not most of us writers who would consider running, er, unclothed through Chapters, or Barnes and Noble or McNally’s if we thought it would make us better known.
Mary
(No, no, you do it first. I’m too old.)
July 17th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Um, I don’t think you’re getting the concept of the magazine, Mary. If you go to their website, it’s clear that they’re working in a post-modern conceptual zone, an area that questions the concept of authorship and text, etc. The French are to blame, not groupies.