.
| Hearsay: |
Andrew Motion is the first poet laureate to retire from the position, as opposed to dying in/from it. Here he writes about the struggles laureates face in pleasing everybody.
I’ve written eight royal poems in the past 10 years: one about the wedding of Prince Edward, one about the 100th birthday of the Queen Mother, one about her death, one about the death of Princess Margaret, one about the 18th birthday of Prince William, one (set to music) about the golden jubilee, one about the wedding of Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles as she then was, and one about the Queen’s diamond wedding anniversary. I have to admit that no other writing that I’ve undertaken, of any kind, has been so difficult. The problem is partly to do with the subjects (if “subject” is quite the word for someone who is not a subject). How was I to connect with them, knowing only what newspapers tell me? How was I to steer an appropriate course between familiarity (which would seem presumptuous) and sycophancy (which would seem absurd)? And how was I to weigh and value them, knowing that a large part of the population doesn’t want there to be a royal family, or feels indifferent to it? The other part of the problem is to do with reception. In every case, after I’d written these eight poems, I sent them to my agent, who sent them to newspapers, where they landed on news editors’ desks. News editors don’t think a poem is a story in and of itself, so they then get on the phone to as many people as it takes to find someone who doesn’t like the poem – then they have their story: poet laureate writes another no-good poem.
I’m not the first laureate to complain about this. John Betjeman (who got so fed up with it he considered resigning) and Hughes say exactly the same thing in their letters. But I am the first person to say it in public – call that a privilege of my 10-year span, if you like. My point is not simply that the response is tiresome for whoever happens to be laureate. The point is: it’s bad for poetry in general – but journalists apparently have some difficulty (or, more likely, no interest) in grasping this.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
March 23rd, 2009 at 10:40 am
I had no idea that poet laureates had to write custom poetry for royal occasions. No wonder he resigned!
March 24th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Unless he was being disingenuous in the creation of those eight poems, why would Motion feel troubled about their reception? “Royal” poems are routinely panned — boo hoo. Maybe the journalists (through assorted critics) actually have a legitimate point or two. Those poems are broadly, nationally received. Every poet would give his or her best molars for that kind of audience.
And I find it incredible that “no other writing … of any kind, has been so difficult”. His other verse must be a breeze to set down. Was the difficulty in imagining the Queen “tsk tsk” ing over his shoulder? Emotional honesty and personal engagement are only important when not writing occasional verse?
Motion is to be applauded for his ambassadorial efforts — readings and poetry programs for schoolchildren, Poetry Archive — but if he were serious in trying to evolve the role of laureate from its traditional understanding, he should have had the balls to make his criticisms while still in that role.