.
| Hearsay: |
Everyone’s got an opinion about the poem read yesterday, the vast majority of them (at least in print) seem to say it was too prosey for the occasion. There seems to be two schools of thought here: one, by people who have no investment or background in poetry: the fact that there was a poet at all shows Obama’s renewed focus on the arts as an instrument of change; and two, by those who hold the medium dear to their hearts: that the delivery and the poem itself constituted what the kids today call an “epic fail”.
I really feel for Alexander here. What a task, what a set of expectations. Sure, the poem wasn’t good, but it wasn’t THAT bad. It was mediocre and the victim of the day—and of following the world’s most eloquent leader. What was a servicable poem designed to be accessible to the widest number of people (ie, not alienate those who already fear poetry) is being pilloried as if it ruined hopes and dreams of the country.
But on the other hand, it kind of did, didn’t it? At least the part of the country that saw this as an opportunity to show people the nigh divine power of words with depth and resonance married to an occasion with dignity and significance. Is it excusable to fail here when someone like Derek Walcott so deftly nailed it with such power and skill it makes me want to emigrate?
I guess everyone’s thinking that if you were picked for this moment you were best suited to encapsulate the emotional and psychic state of the nation, of explaining us to us. And that’s not the case for most poets. Makes me think the poem should have been picked instead of the poet. If you’d seen them all laid out on paper and had recordings of the poets reading them to choose from, would anyone have chosen this poem? Given what else was written for the occasion, I suspect not.
Now, back to feeling sorry for Alexander. She did her best and it was competent, but not up to the moment. But having been the one chosen, she rose to the task and did what she could. Unfortunately, she over-thought things and tried to cater to a wide audience that was too cold and disinterested to hear her out, rather than catering to the moment. The whole thing felt like it was written by committee. She needed fire and brimstone, shock and awe, a seesaw between the personal and the universal, to break through to the crowd and the world. Instead she had people waiting for a bus. Perhaps, for some of the two million there, a reminder it was time to go home.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
January 21st, 2009 at 11:29 am
as I said in an earlier comment, the song in Alexander’s psalm somehow went missing… I suppose there was a collective hope for a 21st century Fanfare for the Common Man (Copeland)… again, as earlier, Walcott’s 40 acres, sang
January 25th, 2009 at 9:55 am
It’s true that Alexander’s poem fell short but Walcott’s poem was written when? Right after Reconstruction or this century? It is dreadfully dated, horribly condescending and written as if the 20th century was unavailable to the poet. Perhap all those who love it live in that old time themselves.