.
| Hearsay: |
“Truth is beauty, beauty truth, sir!”
“But the truth can be harsh and disturbing! How can that be considered beautiful?”
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we poets are less unacknowledged legislators and more idiot savant mathematicians of instinct and luck.
Rolf Reber, together with mathematician Morten Brun and psychologist Karoline Mitterndorfer, all from the University of Bergen, Norway, have reported first empirical evidence for the use of beauty as truth and they have provided an explanation for this phenomenon, based on the processing fluency theory of beauty.
Mathematicians and scientists reportedly used beauty as a cue for truth in mathematical judgment. French mathematician Jacques Hadamard, for example, wrote in 1954 in his famous book, “The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field,” that a sense of beauty seems to be almost the only useful “drive” for discovery in mathematics. However, evidence has been anecdotal, and the nature of the beauty-truth relationship remained a mystery.
In 2004, Rolf Reber (University of Bergen), Norbert Schwarz (University of Michigan), and Piotr Winkielman (University of California at San Diego) suggested – based on evidence they reviewed – that the common experience underlying both perceived beauty and judged truth is processing fluency, which is the experienced ease with which mental content is processed. Indeed, stimuli processed with greater ease elicit more positive affect and statements that participants can read more easily are more likely to be judged as being true.
I have no fucking idea what that means, but I sure know when to end a line. (Of course, I don’t surf science sites for poetry references, but it seems like a bit of an oversight on the part of the article author to not use a Keats hook for the piece, doesn’t it?)
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
November 24th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
In college, I took a class entirely devoted to Keats. At the beginning of the class, the professor offered an ‘A’ to anyone who could come up with a justified explanation to what Keats meant. I sure wish I had this article back then.
November 25th, 2008 at 8:10 am
If I might be permitted to pass on a quotation here, I remind you that R. Buckminster Fuller said:
“When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I only think about how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.”
As for what Keats meant, you could always fall back on negative capability.
November 25th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Roses are Red
And Violets are Purple
And My Love is Sweeter
Than Pythagorean Trigonometry
uh….and Maple Syrple….too