Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

September 29, 2008

Pullman likes a good challenge

Philip Pullman writes on how much he enjoys the experience of having every fundamentalist Christian in the world gunning for you.

When I heard that my novel The Golden Compass (the name in the USA of Northern Lights) appeared in the top five of the American Library Association’s list of 2007’s most challenged books, my immediate and ignoble response was glee. Firstly, I had obviously annoyed a lot of censorious people, and secondly, any ban would provoke interested readers to move from the library, where they couldn’t get hold of my novel, to the bookshops, where they could. That, after all, was exactly what happened when a group called the Catholic League decided to object to the film of The Golden Compass when it was released at the end of last year. The box office suffered, but the book sales went up – a long way up, to my gratification.

Because they never learn. The inevitable result of trying to ban something – book, film, play, pop song, whatever – is that far more people want to get hold of it than would ever have done if it were left alone. Why don’t the censors realise this?

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

4 comments on “Pullman likes a good challenge”

  1. Colleen says:

    I think Pullman’s right about banning books increasing interest therein.

    However, his idea about the film is wrong. The film bombed at the box office because it straight up sucked.

  2. Corey Redekop says:

    I didn’t think the movie sucked, but the director wasn’t suitable to the material.

    And how, HOW do I get my novel banned? I could probably retire on the controversy.

  3. Monica says:

    Corey, maybe i’ve been doing the wrong thing for you. Here i’ve been talking it up, maybe i should talk about all the reasons it should be burned.

    My offspring, who are in grade 12 at a CATHOLIC high school are currently reading a book with sex scenes, a gay rape scene, and other sinful stuff like that. I think its pretty cool that their english teacher seems to have passed this book under the wire, and i’m so looking forward to finding out how she did it. This same
    teacher has their class so pumped about Can Lit.

  4. Paul says:

    I think the movie was very poorly edited. If they jumped from scene to scene any faster, people would have had seizures in aisles. If they allowed the film to pause for breath now and then, and let it be about 20 to 30 minutes longer, it would have been much better, but they hacked it all to hell worrying about kids’ attention spans.

Discuss

Latest comments:
George on
News catchup
Monica on
News catchup
Andrew S on
News catchup
Shelley on
On the dangers of writing about the past
Steven W. Beattie on
Get out there, nerds!
Sean Dixon on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Sean Dixon on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Franklin Carter on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven Jensen on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Brian Busby on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Blake on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Bart King on
How to be a good loser
A.G. Pasquella on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Fred on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Zachariah Wells on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven W. Beattie on
Under-rated Canadian writers


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: