Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

September 18, 2008

On the rejection letter

The Kenyon Review offers this insightful, patchwork essay on our dear old friend, The Rejection Letter. Oh,  fond friend, how I miss thee. Your margin-challenged, firmly worded boilerplate swimming in that number 10 envelope with my own handwriting on the front… I know, some of this is my fault. I’m ready to take that responsibility on. It was indeed I who stopped submitting work to journals years ago—-so, yes, we don’t see each other enough. Let’s get together soon, shall we? I tell you what, I’ll gather some poems to send to the New Yorker, and we’ll have lunch in about three months, ‘kay? (Thanks, AB)

Why do editors say no, anyway? Well, I cannot, of course, speak for All Editors, and I cannot even properly speak for myself, because I reject some pieces from a murky inarticulate intuitive conviction that they’re just not our speed, but there are some general truths to note. We say no because we don’t print that sort of material. We say no because the topic is too far afield. We say no because we have printed eleven pieces of just that sort in the past year alone. We say no because the writing is poor, muddled, shallow, shrill, incoherent, solipsistic, or insane. We say no because we have once before dealt with the writer and still shiver to remember the agony which we swore to high heaven on stacks of squirrel skulls never to experience again come hell or high water. We say no sometimes because we have said yes too much and there are more than twenty pieces in the hopper and none of them will see the light of day for months and the last of the ones waiting may be in the hopper for more than two years, which will lead to wailing and the gnashing of teeth. We say no because if we published it we would be sued by half our advertisers. We say no because we know full well that this is one of the publisher’s two howling bugabears, the other one being restoring American currency to the silver standard. We say no because we are grumpy and have not slept properly and are having dense and complex bladder problems. We say no because our daughters came home yesterday with Mohawk haircuts and boyfriends named Slash. We say no because Britney Spears has sold more records worldwide than Bruce Springsteen. We say no for more reasons than we know.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

6 comments on “On the rejection letter”

  1. Alex Boyd says:

    Worth reading through to the end for the most flattering rejection letter ever written.

  2. Basil Sands says:

    Ahhhh…..that explains that stack on my desk. Now I see the logic. ;)

  3. rr says:

    I still try to send constructive rejections, but it is hard sometimes. There are always those stories I just want to forget about or are so bad I don’t get far enough into them to give any feedback.

  4. Shawn says:

    I love it when he says “I mean, it takes brass balls, as my brothers say, to reject a batch of poems with a curt note while including a subscription form to the review in the same envelope in which the rejection huddles.”!

    One Canadian lit journal’s rejection letter comes with a flyer advertising their service where they will charge you $100 for a several-paragraph critique of your work.

    And yesterday I got a rejection note containing a rather brutal critique and ended “Unfortunately The ———- will not be publishing your story.”

    Ultimately it was that sentence that irked me, not the blunt words about my story. I wanted to reply, “if it was really that bad, don’t you mean ‘fortunately’?”

  5. Shawn says:

    Oops: above, “and ended” should have been “which ended” instead.

  6. Kathryn says:

    What I will add on Shawn’s behalf is that he has a story in the current Prism int’l. It is an awesome story and I highly recommend checking it out. You win some, you lose some; I direct this at the outfit that rejected, naturally…

Discuss

Latest comments:
forex trading on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
binary options trading on
Comics
binary options on
Comics
blackhat forum on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
poker real money on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
wonga loan on
Comics
poker sites uk on
Comics
Laurence on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
888 poker on
Comics
http://www.playonlinepokerwebsites.co.uk on
Comics
poker site on
Comics
http://www.thebestonlinepokeruk.co.uk on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Online Batman Games on
The Man Game: Lee Henderson Interview
criminal background check california on
Derek McCormack's Christmas Days
marketing on
Books price freeze


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: