Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

May 1, 2008

First readers’ notes

Maud points to this piece at VQR that highlights some particularly low moments in the lives of their first line editorial people: readers. A list of notes included with read submissions gives a good sense of the range of pain one can go through while panning the slush pile.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

8 comments on “First readers’ notes”

  1. Waldo Jaquith says:

    It’s funny, one author complained to me how unfair to authors that this is, perceiving this list as something that puffs up readers and makes them feel important for their position. It’s gratifying to see that you appreciate the point here: that reading from the slush pile is precisely the opposite of glamorous. It’s the literary equivalent of mucking out stalls, to use a metaphor a bit more relevant to my own life. :)

  2. Pomeii Doodle says:

    You have to wonder about folks who go to the trouble and expense of editing and publishing a magazine and complain about having to read submissions, though.

  3. George says:

    I don’t think they were complaining about reading submissions, but rather about reading bad submissions. Unless you’ve actually been elbow deep in a slush pile, you can’t possibly imagine how ridiculous it gets. I used to run a small fiction mag and one day I swore that if I had to read one more story written from the perspective of a beloved pet, I would burn the whole fucking pile. Luckily, I folded before then. My co-editor (now my wife) and I used to both read everything, just to make sure we weren’t missing out on anything. A common comment when passing the manuscript was “See how far you can get.”

  4. John Saflo says:

    “Were you in the shit, Bookninja?”

    “Yeah. I was in the shit.”

  5. Waldo Jaquith says:

    We’re not complaining about reading submissions, only sharing a bit of what it’s like to read submissions by people who clearly have never read a single page of VQR.

    By the time our reading period closes on May 31, we will have received 10,400 submissions since our period opened on September 1. We published 160 in the same period.

  6. rr says:

    There’s just something about reading a story about using a dog’s testicles as a bungee cord that sucks a little bit of the life out of you. I think most writers have no idea what editors see in the run of a day. It’s great when you find that one story you love but some days it’s hard to slog through the pile and you start to wonder if there is anything good there at all.

  7. George says:

    I found ninja K in that same slush pile. So good does come of it. Though I was deep in the shit, Max.

  8. Nicole says:

    Submissions. Pshaw. I wish! Try reading high school English ‘essays.’ Try reading high school English ’stories.’ A pet as narrator? At least that story had a narrator. Really, how much money goes into public education and we rarely graduate students who can speak, read and write in one language, let alone the two we are supposed to officially speak.

    Phew. Am breathing now. Am taking a break from marking.

Discuss

Latest comments:
George on
News catchup
Monica on
News catchup
Andrew S on
News catchup
Shelley on
On the dangers of writing about the past
Steven W. Beattie on
Get out there, nerds!
Sean Dixon on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Sean Dixon on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Franklin Carter on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven Jensen on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Brian Busby on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Blake on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Bart King on
How to be a good loser
A.G. Pasquella on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Fred on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Zachariah Wells on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven W. Beattie on
Under-rated Canadian writers


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: