Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

April 25, 2008

Future of books safe

The LATimes examines the numbers around the health and general viability of The Book and comes out saying, everything’s gonna be aw-ight. Why? Because we love to hold them. Aw.

Edward Tenner, visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who spoke at the conference, said: “What’s valuable in a text is not just the text, but the way it is presented — the typography, the materials. The growth of electronic information puts books in a new light.”

And that light often is an exquisitely reverent one, embodied in the gentle contemplations of book fanciers such as Alberto Manguel. In “The Library at Night,” published this month, the Argentine-born author and bibliophile celebrates books as brothers, as crucial companions for a lifetime.

As information is digitized, the books that remain gripped between covers seem to be cherished all the more. Yet, that too carries some peril, as Bruce Hatton Boyer, associate professor of English at National-Louis University and a member of the Caxton Club, pointed out in a recent edition of the club’s journal.

“Will we have a world in which the only value books have will be those of the rare object, making all libraries in effect rare-book libraries?”

Schreyer hopes not. She loves her job, but she doesn’t want the “special” in special collections to make the books in her keeping seem arcane or untouchable.

“There’s an emotional rapport you get with an era by holding a relic that is hundreds of years old,” she said. “Part of the history of a book is — who were the people who touched this book at every stage in its life?”

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: “The Book” as a concept/object isn’t what’s in danger… “The GOOD Book”, however, is holding up two fingers above the choppy surface. It’s a numbers game. Like if all the cockroaches under the fridge in my old apartment on Bathurst had decided to rise up against the parade boots my girlfriend and I wore at the time, and which became our main offensive weapons. It would have taken them about an hour to munch us away to nothing in the bed.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

1 comment on “Future of books safe”

  1. John Miedema says:

    Co-existence seems more likely. Digital technology is easily better for searching for information. Books are unquestionably the better and cheaper technology for reading anything of any length or substance.

Discuss

Latest comments:
buy iphone 5 on
Comics
keylogger on
The Man Game: Lee Henderson Interview
raspberry ketone diet on
Comics
raspberry ketone plus on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
binary options trading on
Comics
binary options on
Comics
blackhat forum on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
poker real money on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
wonga loan on
Comics
poker sites uk on
Comics
Laurence on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
888 poker on
Comics
http://www.playonlinepokerwebsites.co.uk on
Comics
poker site on
Comics
http://www.thebestonlinepokeruk.co.uk on
Comics


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: