.
| Hearsay: |
Ireland’s Independent on the worth of independents.
Think of the word “independent” in the book world, and you imagine young fogeys in tweed jackets with leather elbow patches, earnestly proclaiming the merits of obscure novels by Japanese octogenarians which sell precisely three copies before being remaindered.
However, the best-seller lists of recent years tell quite a different story. Eats, Shoots and Leaves, The Life of Pi, Stef Penney’s The Tenderness of Wolves, the Booker-longlisted What Was Lost, by Catherine O’Flynn, all demonstrate that the current crop of independents are energetic go-getters, unearthing treasures that would be lost in bigger houses, and publishing them with focus and a positivity that would put their bigger counterparts to shame. But are these successes simply one-offs, or part of a larger sea-change in which the flat-footed behemoths that are the conglomerates are being outstripped by nimbler, smaller rivals? Do independent publishers really make a difference?
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
November 28th, 2007 at 7:32 am
In Australia, one independent has had three books shortlisted for the Booker in the past two years (Text: Mister Pip, Carry Me Down, The Secret River). Another independent published the book that won our big national literary prize, the Miles Franklin (Giramondo, the book was Carpentaria by Alexis Wright).
All our best books, especially novels, are published by independents. No coincidence, I think!