Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

September 18, 2007

The collaborative book

A case study in collaborative writing shows things can be good, fulfilling even. I personally think it’s a recipe for murder and burial in a cold wood’s shallow grave. Try to edit my clever aphorism, will you?

WHEN REBECCA Sparrow thought of writing a novel with her mentor, Nick Earls, she was warned: “There are no people who have ever written a novel together who are friends at the end of it.”

Not true. Australian writers Dymphna Cusack and Florence James spent an idyllic time writing the first draft of their novel Come in Spinner, and stayed friends though a gruelling five-year editing process. They wrote under the name of Sydney Wyborne, and when the book won the Daily Telegraph prize, the editor refused to speak to Cusack when she called to make an appointment, and insisted he would only talk to Wyborne. (Obviously Come in Spinner couldn’t possibly have been written by a woman, let alone two.)

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

4 comments on “The collaborative book”

  1. Nick Earls says:

    I’m with you George. A collaborative novel sounds, on the surface, like a one-way ticket to madness to me. The last thing I’d want would be someone else getting their hands all over my clever aphorism because they somehow co-owned it. Some people seem fine with that though – and good for them for being such sharers.

    Rebecca Sparrow and I managed it by writing in tandem (her idea, and one used by several others previously). I had my chapters (from the main male character’s POV), she had her chapters (from the main female character’s POV) and we alternated. The deal was you took whatever came in and you worked with it – no changing the other author’s work. We kept that up right through to the editing. Our editor worked with me on my half, and with Bec on her half.

    So, we each had our own novel within the novel, in a way. It was still a new adventure though, sitting waiting for the Tuesday chapter to arrive before you could write Wednesday, then sending Wednesday off as soon as you’d hit the last ‘.’.

    I think it’s essential to have the right partner, the right story and the right ground rules. Plenty of other people seem to have been happy to take it on with less clarity than that though.

  2. George says:

    Hi Nick,

    Thanks for the inside perpsective. That does sound easier. Was the editor’s job to smooth the structure out for continuity, etc, or was it to make the writing “match” to create the feel of a single author?

    G

  3. Sara says:

    I’m in the thick of writing a collaborative novel with my thirteen-year-old son and have to say that half the fun is in actually working together – discussing the story, brainstorming for ideas, re-writing each other, and having him correct my awful typos.

  4. Nick Earls says:

    We wanted the two voices to remain distinct but compatible, so our editor looked at potential continuity glitches and focused on each of us getting the most out of our story, making sure each chapter paid its way. We had to pay particular attention when circumstances brought our characters’ relatively separate lives properly into collision about half way through – suddenly I had to be able to write about Bec’s character Cat’s father and she had to be able to write about my character Joel’s mother. At one level we each wanted to handle the other’s supporting characters with some caution, at another it was great to be able to bring a fresh pair of eyes to bear on these people. On thing we did do and that I don’t normally do was we sat down together and cut pictures out of magazines to represent our characters, so that we both had the same ideas about how they looked.

    The only time our editor got us to take a look at each other’s work was at the page-proof stage when she sent us each the other person’s chapters and asked us to check any dialogue that the other writer had put into our characters’ mouths. But Bec and I had worked hard to pay attention to that, so I don’t think we changed more than a word or two.

Discuss

Latest comments:
same day loans for unemployed on
Comics
voyance on
Litterati: Sold Out
http://www.paydayonline.webeden.co.uk on
Comics
payday loans for bad credit on
Comics
http://www.cigaretteelectroniquex.fr on
Comics
car hire in france on
Comics
centauro car hire on
Comics
contract car hire on
Comics
easycarhireuk.co.uk/ on
Comics
car hire gatwick airport on
Comics
online pokies on
Causing a Scene - Brenda Schmidt
web hosting on
Comics
website hosting on
Comics
replica rayban on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
http://ew67gt7ed5.pixnet.net/blog/post/24207419 on
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Lawsuit
oase solarpumpe on
Impossible to Die in Your Dreams
Hollister Online Shop on
Entitlement: Jonathan Bennett Interview
Hollister Online Shop on
Comics
nike air max homme on
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Lawsuit
solarpumpen für gartenteich on
Impossible to Die in Your Dreams


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: