Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

September 10, 2007

A new criticism?

Fans of William Gibson have created an aggregator of sorts that organizes searchable critical reception on his new novel, Spook Country, into a “cloud” of responses that record reading paths through the novel. The article’s author thinks this could be the future of literary criticism. I am getting sort of dizzy thinking about it.

If you asked me what are the two best-annotated texts available to scholar and student in canonical English Literature, I would say the Alistair Fowler edition of Paradise Lost and the Ann Thompson edition of Hamlet. Colleagues would probably come up with alternative contenders. But they would be the same kind of footnote / endnote enterprises. Old school.

What the unknown Node-maestro has done is poles apart, both from this, and from the usual website-based ‘everybody pitch in’ mess. He’s channelled the raw material supplied by his volunteers into a sign-posted route through Spook Country. It opens the way, I believe, to a new kind of critical commentary on texts. One can see, easily enough, how it could be extended to Paradise Lost, or Hamlet.

Interesting stuff. But what this has really opened my eyes to is the need for an army of highly-skilled fanatics to support my career. As far as I can tell, you lot are only mildly fanatical, or perhaps just OCD. And you can’t program things that don’t include the phrase “20 goto 10″. When was the last time you reinvented criticism for me? Pfft.

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

4 comments on “A new criticism?”

  1. Jason Boog says:

    Thanks for the BASIC programming reference. I’m still laughing.

    As a kid I tried to build text-based videogames using that infuriating language on a TI-82. I’ll write a text-based BookNinja Choose Your Own Adventure Videogame for BASIC–by this time next year, literary criticism will be re-invented on the TI-82 that probably still sits in my parents’ basement.

  2. Wendy says:

    Ummm…facebook pullquote? Hello?

    We’re reinventing criticism for you, George. Just in the other direction.

  3. Jimmy says:

    Am I the only one who thinks this looks like annotation rather than criticism? Am I the only one who sees a difference between the two? Am I the only one who cares?

  4. J Trotter says:

    Jimmy,

    You’re right, this nodal annotator is not criticism. However, I see no reason why critical work (as well as this discussion about it) could not be incorporated into the mix.

Discuss

Latest comments:
George on
News catchup
Monica on
News catchup
Andrew S on
News catchup
Shelley on
On the dangers of writing about the past
Steven W. Beattie on
Get out there, nerds!
Sean Dixon on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Sean Dixon on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Franklin Carter on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven Jensen on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Rob Payne on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Brian Busby on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Blake on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Aaron on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Bart King on
How to be a good loser
A.G. Pasquella on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Fred on
Facebook claims it owns the word "book"
Zachariah Wells on
Under-rated Canadian writers
Steven W. Beattie on
Under-rated Canadian writers


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: