Old Site


Bookninja 2.0:



.

Hearsay:

July 31, 2007

Nan Talese? Are you in there?

Nan Talese says the only person involved in the Frey scandal who owes an apology is Oprah, for stoning Frey in public on her show.

Um…

(I suspect Nan Talese has mister Frey confused with the little people who live in her briefcase — the ones with spiral pupils in their eyes, and those fancy red hats, who dance and sing on rainbows and shit gumdrops…)

Now. People. You know how I feel about Orpah. I think she’s an overbearing ego- and money making- machine with no redeeming value. But. Come. On. This just can’t be right. She must have been misquoted. I agree Oprah was engaged in foul-mannered ass-covering, but…

Share the 'Ninja with your 2.0 friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email

5 comments on “Nan Talese? Are you in there?”

  1. Paul says:

    Actually, I agree with Nan.

  2. Jimmy says:

    i do too, more or less. at least, oprah created a media monster & then went into sloppy, hysterical damage control mode when the media buzz went nasty. but it was far from unpredictable: cf. bakhtin, mcluhan, baudrillard. it was oprah who turned an obscure, hack-ish author into an icon, but not, typically, she who payed when the audience discovered the less than iconic human behind the myth of opra brand authenticity, she threw him to the mob. of course, they both made a truly obscene amount of money promoting the book as the new face of ‘authenticity.’

  3. Jimmy says:

    forgive the run-on-ish quality of the above post: my browser won’t let me see the far right side of the comment box, so it’s easy to lose track of clauses, thoughts, etc.

  4. blork says:

    You can see the video of Talese’s comments on YouTube, here [see link above]

    I agree with her. I sounds like Oprah basically picked up on the ill-informed outrage of her readers and milked it for her own publicity. Worse, she did it in a pretty sneaky way.

  5. eris says:

    I can’t believe people are still talking about this. As far as I’m concerned every person involved in the making and marketing of that book – from the teacher who taught Frey the alphabet to, yes, Oprah herself- should be ashamed of themselves. I happened to buy it for someone because it was on their Christmas list, and as I usually do during the festive season of book giving, set about to reading it before wrapping it. I don’t believe I’ve ever before been confronted with such eye ball gouging inducing agony in the form of the written word. I lasted 30 pages. I wrapped it quickly and tried not to feel guilty for giving something so poorly written as a “gift”.
    Fact or fiction? Who cares? That sort of thing should be an indictable offence. I mean, trees died, man, poor innocent trees…
    I think we’re all owed way more than an apology, from everyone involved in that scheme

Discuss

Latest comments:
raspberry ketone diet on
Comics
raspberry ketone plus on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
forex trading on
Comics
binary options trading on
Comics
binary options on
Comics
blackhat forum on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
poker real money on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
Amy on
Beah defends books against charges of lies
wonga loan on
Comics
poker sites uk on
Comics
Laurence on
Discussion: On Sex in Fiction
888 poker on
Comics
http://www.playonlinepokerwebsites.co.uk on
Comics
poker site on
Comics
http://www.thebestonlinepokeruk.co.uk on
Comics
online poker sites on
Comics
Online Batman Games on
The Man Game: Lee Henderson Interview


Search blog:
Archives:
Old site archive:

January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003

Feeds: