.
| Hearsay: |
I’ve never met an author I didn’t like. Wait, let me rephrase that: I hate everybody. But Rachel Toor is more forgiving in this piece from the Chronicle in which she examines the phenomenon of asshole authors. (Rachel, have I got a few stories for you…)
By the time I left publishing, in the mid-90s, I had decided there were no bad books, only bad authors.
That, of course, is not true. There are plenty of bad books. But after a dozen years in the industry, the whining and whingeing of authors had worn me down: The conspiracy theories about how a publisher set out to ruin an author’s career by not sending his 15-year-old book to a small regional conference; the notion that a publisher sullied an author’s reputation by giving her a red cover; the complaint that there were not enough ads promoting the book (there were never enough ads); the indignation that we didn’t get the author reviewed in The New York Times, or booked on Oprah.
In general I adored my authors. But there were those few whose behavior suggested to me that flipping burgers or mucking out stalls would have been an easier and more pleasurable career choice. When I was an editorial assistant, I watched as one well-regarded author so managed to vex and trouble every single person at the press that by the time his book came out, no one would take his calls. Including his editor.
People go into publishing not only because they love books but because they love working with authors. Editors, in particular, are possessive: They speak of “my books,” “my authors.” It is, therefore, disconcerting and disturbing to see the disconnect in how some authors perceive publishers and how frequently writers are dissatisfied with the process. Friends in publishing think of those writers as the spawn of the devil, the evil seeds.
I asked my literary agent, Susan Arellano, what makes for a “bad” author. Susan has worked as an editor at both trade and university presses and now commands six-figure advances for academic authors. With characteristic acumen, she answered: “Bad authors are the ones who don’t know, or can’t remember, that publishing is a business.”
Also, the ones who torture and kill people in their basements. They’re bad too.
January 2006
December
2005
November
2005
October
2005
September
2005
August
2005
July
2005
June
2005
May
2005
April
2005
March
2005
February
2005
January
2005
December
2004
November
2004
October
2004
September
2004
August
2004
July
2004
June
2004
May
2004
April
2004
March
2004
February
2004
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
August
2003
Bookninja © Copyright
The opinions expressed on this site are those of individual participants
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owners,
organizers, or other participants.
[powered by WordPress.]
June 29th, 2007 at 11:53 am
I liked what Toor is saying here. I think as an underclass, writers are mainly pains in the a**es. We are always trying to get more than is possible from a business that takes our art work and necessarily turns it into a commodity. There is a stystem involved in that process which is very corrupting. Many of us get mangled and turn bitter, which is horrible. I do think that there are also people in any business who are just plain unpleasant. But nothing worse than an unpleasant writer, I suppose. Despite disappointment, I try not to be that kind of writer. I try to have a sense of humor about everything and take whatever I can and make it a useful experience. My blog (I hope) is a testament to that effort–as much as it is a testament to how difficult the publishing industry (not even really the individuals working within it) can be. I think we should make it all as transaparent as possible.
June 29th, 2007 at 12:59 pm
I don’t know about any of you, but I’m in it for the carefully crafted, exquisitely designed letterheads on my form rejections.
July 2nd, 2007 at 12:11 pm
Authors should complain more about bad covers. Slave for two or three years on your book, only to have some design-school grad piss all over it?
Balls. Publishers should consider that their authors may have some aesthetic sense beyond the written word. Surely the temples of publishing would crumble if authors were allowed to design their own covers, but they should at least have the right to veto inept designs.